| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: perltidy version |
| Date: | 2018-03-03 23:03:30 |
| Message-ID: | 15694.1520118210@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> Ah yeah, if I apply that one first, the diff from using 20140328 is much
> smaller. Attached is that one, which means the difference between the two
> perltidy versions.
I'm hardly a Perl guru, so I'm not going to opine on whether these
changes are for the better or worse. They're definitely not very
extensive, though. If the folks here who do hack Perl a lot think
the 20140328 output is better, I'm fine with switching.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2018-03-03 23:59:19 | Re: [HACKERS] GUC for cleanup indexes threshold. |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2018-03-03 22:40:33 | Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: multivariate histograms and MCV lists |