From: | PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | jgiaco(at)fanatics(dot)com |
Subject: | Reference tables in triggers are supported in 10 |
Date: | 2019-09-06 14:47:39 |
Message-ID: | 156778125989.1118.105251422157993558@wrigleys.postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/infoschema-triggers.html
Description:
The documentation states the following:
action_reference_old_table sql_identifier Applies to a feature not available
in PostgreSQL
action_reference_new_table sql_identifier Applies to a feature not available
in PostgreSQL
action_reference_old_row sql_identifier Applies to a feature not available
in PostgreSQL
action_reference_new_row sql_identifier Applies to a feature not available
in PostgreSQL
...but REFERENCING OLD/NEW TABLE AS is valid in postgres 10. Why does the
infoschema not store this information. I believe this is causing issues in
3rd party tools (DataGrip specifically) that probably rely on
information_schema to generate triggers and omit this key information. I
dont think this is a documention bug as much as a bug in postgres not
storing the information in information_schema.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-09-09 17:34:33 | Re: Reference tables in triggers are supported in 10 |
Previous Message | PG Doc comments form | 2019-09-05 15:58:22 | Please add example |