Re: How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work

From:	Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To:	Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cc:	pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject:	Re: How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
Date:	2008-05-23 13:20:21
Message-ID:	15673.1211548821@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2008-03-31 23:26:29 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>  2008-04-01 00:46:44 from Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>   2008-04-01 01:51:08 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>    2008-04-01 02:12:06 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>     2008-04-01 05:35:24 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>      2008-04-01 05:51:11 from "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>       2008-04-01 06:06:36 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>        2008-04-01 06:52:55 from "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>         2008-04-02 00:05:12 from Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>          2008-04-02 00:35:17 from "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>           2008-04-02 00:53:23 from Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>            2008-04-02 01:04:04 from "Guillaume Smet" <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>             2008-04-10 09:47:36 from Thomas Burdairon <tburdairon(at)entelience(dot)com>              2008-04-10 10:44:20 from Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>               2008-04-10 12:33:39 from Thomas Burdairon <tburdairon(at)entelience(dot)com>               2008-05-29 03:13:12 from "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM>                2008-05-29 03:19:45 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>                 2008-05-29 03:22:34 from "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM>  2008-04-01 10:25:14 from Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>   2008-04-01 11:14:34 from Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>    2008-04-01 14:06:01 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>     2008-04-01 14:26:52 from Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>     2008-04-01 14:43:58 from PFC <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com>    2008-04-01 14:21:34 from Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>  2008-05-23 10:20:45 from Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>   2008-05-23 13:20:21 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>    2008-05-28 12:25:14 from Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>     2008-05-28 14:24:51 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Lists:	pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

In response to

• Re: How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work at 2008-05-23 10:20:45 from Dave Cramer

Responses

• Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work at 2008-05-28 12:25:14 from Dave Cramer

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Gurjeet Singh	2008-05-23 16:20:24	Random order of archiving files
Previous Message	Heikki Linnakangas	2008-05-23 12:48:02	Re: [HACKERS] Error while executing pg_dump "invalid memory alloc request size 4294967293"

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Dave Cramer	2008-05-28 12:25:14	Re: [HACKERS] How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work
Previous Message	Dave Cramer	2008-05-23 10:20:45	Re: How embarrassing: optimization of a one-shot query doesn't work