| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Do all accesses to shared buffer headers through |
| Date: | 2005-10-13 00:27:32 |
| Message-ID: | 15672.1129163252@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> IMHO it is notationally clearer to define a "BufferDescPtr" that
> contains the "volatile" qualifier than to make sure that "volatile" is
> used everywhere that it is needed -- obviously, neither approach is
> fool-proof. But perhaps that's just me...
Personally I dislike hiding type qualifiers like const and volatile
inside typedefs. I agree it's a judgment call.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | User Aglio | 2005-10-13 00:39:48 | press - pr: Final edits in preparation for translation. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-10-13 00:06:47 | pgsql: Don't try to remove duplicate OR-subclauses in |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2005-10-13 00:33:01 | Re: Comments on columns in the pg_catalog tables/views |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2005-10-12 23:36:30 | Re: pgsql: Do all accesses to shared buffer headers |