From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SHOW command always returns text field |
Date: | 2011-08-10 18:50:00 |
Message-ID: | 15666.1313002200@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mi ago 10 14:12:49 -0400 2011:
>> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>>> I was slightly surprised the other day that the SHOW command always
>>> returns a field of type text even if the underlying parameter has one of
>>> the other types (int, real, etc.). Is this intentional? Would it be
>>> worth refining?
>> I'm disinclined to mess with it. One thing that couldn't easily be
>> "cleaned up" is the textual output for nominally-numeric parameters
>> that have units.
> How about having it return a record?
I think that's already covered by the pg_settings view. The question is
whether plain SHOW ought to change. I don't see the point.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2011-08-10 18:54:06 | Re: "pgstat wait timeout" warnings |
Previous Message | Dave Byrne | 2011-08-10 18:47:24 | Possible Bug in pg_upgrade |