Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> Yea, that works for me. I wonder if we should choose an absurd sentinel
>> value to prevent code from relying on one? 0x0000beef or such. Unless
>> somebody protests soon-ish I'll make it so.
> Pushed that way (with 0x5EED as the value, seems more appropriate ;)).
LGTM, thanks!
> I can't convince any of my compilers to actual emit warnings in this
> case, so we'll have to see whether prairiedog like this...
Per my results yesterday, locust and coypu were also complaining;
one of them might come back quicker.
regards, tom lane