From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Nicolai Tufar" <ntufar(at)apb(dot)com(dot)tr> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Segmentation fault while COPY in 7.3 |
Date: | 2002-12-01 04:57:26 |
Message-ID: | 15558.1038718646@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
"Nicolai Tufar" <ntufar(at)apb(dot)com(dot)tr> writes:
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x081697bf in pfree (pointer=0x828a7b0) at mcxt.c:480
> #1 0x080b37be in CopyTo (rel=0x402be088, attnumlist=0x828a3f8, binary=0
> '\0', oids=0 '\0',
> fp=0x0, delim=0x81c2a57 "\t", null_print=0x81b2c22 "\\N") at copy.c:671
> #2 0x080b32f6 in DoCopy (stmt=0x827b398) at copy.c:491
Hm. Offhand it would seem that somebody's output function is returning
a non-palloc'd string. What are the datatypes in that table, exactly?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nicolai Tufar | 2002-12-01 05:09:56 | Re: Segmentation fault while COPY in 7.3 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-12-01 04:53:33 | Re: Hard-coded PUBLIC in pg_dump |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nicolai Tufar | 2002-12-01 05:09:56 | Re: Segmentation fault while COPY in 7.3 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-12-01 04:53:33 | Re: Hard-coded PUBLIC in pg_dump |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-12-01 05:03:05 | Re: 7.4 To Do |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-12-01 04:53:33 | Re: Hard-coded PUBLIC in pg_dump |