Re: Segmentation fault while COPY in 7.3

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Nicolai Tufar" <ntufar(at)apb(dot)com(dot)tr>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault while COPY in 7.3
Date: 2002-12-01 04:57:26
Message-ID: 15558.1038718646@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

"Nicolai Tufar" <ntufar(at)apb(dot)com(dot)tr> writes:
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x081697bf in pfree (pointer=0x828a7b0) at mcxt.c:480
> #1 0x080b37be in CopyTo (rel=0x402be088, attnumlist=0x828a3f8, binary=0
> '\0', oids=0 '\0',
> fp=0x0, delim=0x81c2a57 "\t", null_print=0x81b2c22 "\\N") at copy.c:671
> #2 0x080b32f6 in DoCopy (stmt=0x827b398) at copy.c:491

Hm. Offhand it would seem that somebody's output function is returning
a non-palloc'd string. What are the datatypes in that table, exactly?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nicolai Tufar 2002-12-01 05:09:56 Re: Segmentation fault while COPY in 7.3
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-12-01 04:53:33 Re: Hard-coded PUBLIC in pg_dump

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nicolai Tufar 2002-12-01 05:09:56 Re: Segmentation fault while COPY in 7.3
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-12-01 04:53:33 Re: Hard-coded PUBLIC in pg_dump

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-12-01 05:03:05 Re: 7.4 To Do
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-12-01 04:53:33 Re: Hard-coded PUBLIC in pg_dump