| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Last infomask bit |
| Date: | 2007-01-05 14:48:24 |
| Message-ID: | 15510.1168008504@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> .... I believe it would actually be even better to combine the t_natts and
> t_infomask fields to a single 32-bit infomask field.
That's not happening, because the alignment is wrong ...unless maybe
we switch this field to fall before t_ctid, but that would screw up
the MinimalTuple hack.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-05 14:54:15 | Re: Deadline-Based Vacuum Delay |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-05 14:39:53 | Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD | 2007-01-05 16:25:08 | Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-05 14:39:53 | Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off |