| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> |
| Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Philip Warner" <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Giles Lean" <giles(at)nemeton(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? |
| Date: | 2002-10-28 18:15:50 |
| Message-ID: | 15508.1035828950@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> writes:
> The problem with flex is, that the generated c file does #include <unistd.h>
> before we #include "postgres.h".
> In this situation _LARGE_FILES is not defined for unistd.h and unistd.h
> chooses to define _LARGE_FILE_API, those two are not compatible.
Yeah. AFAICS the only way around this is to avoid doing any I/O
operations in the flex-generated files. Fortunately, that's not much
of a restriction.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-10-28 18:22:00 | Re: [HACKERS] Request for supported platforms |
| Previous Message | Larry Rosenman | 2002-10-28 17:36:26 | Re: [ANNOUNCE] Server downtime ... |