Re: Static PostgreSQL Binaries (Linux + Windows)

From: Zach van Rijn <me(at)zv(dot)io>
To: Pratik Parikh <pratik(dot)p(dot)parikh(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Static PostgreSQL Binaries (Linux + Windows)
Date: 2019-01-13 14:13:26
Message-ID: 1547388806.4002.20.camel@zv.io
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sun, 2019-01-13 at 00:51 -0500, Pratik Parikh wrote:
> Than you. nice to hear from you .  Would be able to share the
> build scripts with community? are they open source?

Hi Pratik,

Yes; the build scripts were linked at the bottom of my original
mail message in this chain: https://git.zv.io/xstatic/builder/

$ git clone https://git.zv.io/xstatic/builder.git
$ cd builder
$ ./build postgresql-<release> # 11.1, etc.

Under the hood, the only major "technique" is wrapping the 'gcc'
command with flags such as '-static' to ensure that everything
is built correctly, and using reliable toolchains [1].

There is one minor issue in that the postgres build scripts no
longer appear to support static building [2,3] so it'll attempt
to build files such as 'POSIX.so' etc. and these cause errors.

The workaround is simply to ignore these errors during build
until I or someone else can get around to supplying patches (in
the next week or so; I have other commitments).

>
> Regards,
> Pratik Parikh

ZV

[1]: https://musl.cc/

[2]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CABFfbXuxyO20JN8T%2BC
yfSe29T-GTON69FrKHQ%3Dc9jDMxnm6C_w%40mail.gmail.com

[3]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CABFfbXvONEKE2Bpnbfm5
%3Df3fVVLpv6jLVUAhF7iGoWN7a_EeRw%40mail.gmail.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pratik Parikh 2019-01-13 14:15:03 Re: Static PostgreSQL Binaries (Linux + Windows)
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2019-01-13 11:25:53 Re: How to always run UPDATE FROM despite missing records in the source table?