Re: tap tests on older branches fail if concurrency is used

From:	Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To:	Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc:	pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject:	Re: tap tests on older branches fail if concurrency is used
Date:	2017-06-01 13:48:55
Message-ID:	15453.1496324935@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2017-06-01 00:15:15 from Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>  2017-06-01 00:59:35 from Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>  2017-06-01 03:45:14 from Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>   2017-06-07 05:37:19 from Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> 📎  2017-06-01 13:48:55 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>   2017-06-07 05:39:26 from Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>    2017-06-08 01:09:55 from Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

In response to

• tap tests on older branches fail if concurrency is used at 2017-06-01 00:15:15 from Andres Freund

Responses

• Re: tap tests on older branches fail if concurrency is used at 2017-06-07 05:39:26 from Michael Paquier

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Mark Dilger	2017-06-01 13:51:29	Re: pg_class.relpartbound definition overly brittle
Previous Message	Tom Lane	2017-06-01 13:31:19	Re: pg_class.relpartbound definition overly brittle