From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
Cc: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Mark kirkwood <markir(at)slingshot(dot)co(dot)nz>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Solaris Performance |
Date: | 2002-02-10 16:43:25 |
Message-ID: | 15447.1013359405@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
>> Assuming PostgreSQL runs on Linux on SPARC (can't remember).
> It does. Debian has successfully built 7.1.3 on basically every architecture
> supported, which include SPARC. Unfortunatly they don't run the regression
> tests so it's not clear if all the compiler warnings are meaningless.
> http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=&pkg=postgresql
Those warnings look like the same ones I've seen many times on Debian
Alpha. AFAICT they're indicative of nothing except sloppy programming
in a system header file.
I can report that 7.2 passes regression tests on sourceforge's
SPARC/Linux machine, which claims to be Debian 2.2. uname says
Linux usf-cf-sparc-linux-1 2.2.18pre21 #1 SMP Wed Nov 22 17:27:17 EST 2000 sparc64 unknown
Curiously, though, I don't see any of the mathinline warnings on that
machine. Slightly different Debian version perhaps?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-02-10 16:44:24 | Re: what's the meaning of the word "Tioga" in source |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-02-10 16:29:57 | Re: another "EXPLAIN -- NO INDEX?" question |