From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> |
Cc: | "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>, "'Hiroshi Inoue'" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
Subject: | Re: AW: Big 7.1 open items |
Date: | 2000-06-28 14:57:52 |
Message-ID: | 15434.962204272@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at> writes:
>>>> I've been assuming that we would create a separate tablespace for
>>>> each database, which would be the location of that database's
>>>> system tables. It's probably also the default tablespace for user
>>>> tables created in that database, though it wouldn't have to be.
> I think I would prefer the ability to place more than one database into
> the same tablespace.
You can put user tables from multiple databases into the same
tablespace, under this proposal. Just not system tables.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-06-28 14:58:22 | LC_MESSAGES and BSD/OS |
Previous Message | pgsql-hackers | 2000-06-28 14:34:44 | Re: 7.0.2 on Solaris |