From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrey Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Increase value of OUTER_VAR |
Date: | 2021-04-07 13:40:37 |
Message-ID: | 1542424.1617802837@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Can we move forward with this?
> I suppose there was still some uncertainty about whether all the places
> that need changing have been identified, but do we have a better idea
> how to find them?
We could just push the change and see what happens. But I was thinking
more in terms of doing that early in the v15 cycle. I remain skeptical
that we need a near-term fix.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2021-04-07 13:41:55 | Re: Set access strategy for parallel vacuum workers |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2021-04-07 13:35:56 | Re: Increase value of OUTER_VAR |