From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
Cc: | elein(at)varlena(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: returning CHAR from C function |
Date: | 2002-12-01 04:39:42 |
Message-ID: | 15416.1038717582@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> As a follow up, this works:
> create OR REPLACE function retchar(text)
> returns "char"
Yes. This is even documented in a reasonably prominent place, ie
the definition of "char" at the bottom of
http://www.ca.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.2/postgres/datatype-character.html
To wit: the single-byte char type must be spelled "char" (with the
double quotes), not char (which is defined by SQL92 as character(1),
a completely different type).
This is pretty ugly, but I don't see a way to migrate to something
less confusing without breaking lots of existing code.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-12-01 04:53:33 | Re: Hard-coded PUBLIC in pg_dump |
Previous Message | David Wheeler | 2002-12-01 04:24:17 | Re: 7.4 Wishlist |