Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Roy Badami <roy(at)gnomon(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,
Date: 2005-03-23 23:04:52
Message-ID: 15413.1111619092@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Roy Badami <roy(at)gnomon(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> Tom> We should do that *only* when an ISO (not ANSI)
> Just to clarify, is that a distinction or just a clarification? (ie
> are ANSI and ISO SQL different?)

There is no "ANSI SQL". Only ISO SQL. ANSI never issued their own
spec to my knowledge ... unlike, say, C, where I believe ANSI C was
in fact issued by ANSI.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-03-23 23:06:40 Re: BUG #1518: Conversions to (undocumented) SQL year-month
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-03-23 23:03:03 Re: BUG #1517: SQL interval syntax is accepted by the parser,