Re: Hash Joins vs. Bloom Filters / take 2

From: Jim Finnerty <jfinnert(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hash Joins vs. Bloom Filters / take 2
Date: 2018-11-01 20:23:06
Message-ID: 1541103786568-0.post@n3.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Tomas,

I'm very interested in this patch, and particularly in possible
extensions to push the Bloom filter down on the probe side of the join. I
made a few small edits to the patch to enable it to compile on PG11, and can
send it to you if you're interested.

It is currently in the list of patches for the current commitfest, but
based on your previous post I'm not sure if you're planning to get back to
this patch just now. If you plan to resume work on it, I'll sign up as a
reviewer.

thank you,

/Jim Finnerty

-----
Jim Finnerty, AWS, Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers-f1928748.html

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Paul Ramsey 2018-11-01 20:55:16 Compressed TOAST Slicing
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2018-11-01 20:02:46 Re: Doubts about pushing LIMIT to MergeAppendPath