From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Mike Rylander <mrylander(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Install some slightly realistic cost estimation |
Date: | 2005-04-21 14:57:57 |
Message-ID: | 15397.1114095477@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Mike Rylander <mrylander(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> unrelated indexes? Could this bitmapping code be used to combine
> indexes from different tables, say in a large UNION or inherited table
> setup?
> should be true when the implementation is complete.
No, it's only for combining indexes on a single table --- the bitmaps
only store TIDs, which are relative to a particular table. I don't
think there'd be any advantage to extending the technique to handle
multiple tables; the real win comes when you AND or OR overlapping
bitmaps, and there could never be any overlap between two different
tables.
If we had multi-table indexes it'd be a different story of course.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-04-21 15:20:08 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Install some slightly realistic cost |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-21 14:49:41 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Install some slightly realistic cost estimation |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-04-21 15:08:48 | Re: Postgres: pg_hba.conf, md5, pg_shadow, encrypted passwords |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-04-21 14:49:41 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Install some slightly realistic cost estimation |