Re: Foreign key joins revisited

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)compiler(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Foreign key joins revisited
Date: 2021-12-29 09:46:52
Message-ID: 15396c9b-ad78-4c68-7dcb-17d3b8ece972@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 28.12.21 20:45, Vik Fearing wrote:
> I don't particularly like this whole idea anyway, but if we're going to
> have it, I would suggest
>
> JOIN ... USING KEY ...
>
> since USING currently requires a parenthesized list, that shouldn't
> create any ambiguity.

In the 1990s, there were some SQL drafts that included syntax like

JOIN ... USING PRIMARY KEY | USING FOREIGN KEY | USING CONSTRAINT ...

AFAICT, these ideas just faded away because of other priorities, so if
someone wants to revive it, some work already exists.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2021-12-29 10:04:03 Re: Converting WAL to SQL
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2021-12-29 07:42:53 Re: psql - add SHOW_ALL_RESULTS option