Re: Multibyte encoding vs. SQL_ASCII vs. locales and European languages

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Frank Joerdens <frank(at)joerdens(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Multibyte encoding vs. SQL_ASCII vs. locales and European languages
Date: 2002-01-29 18:54:04
Message-ID: 15392.1012330444@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Frank Joerdens <frank(at)joerdens(dot)de> writes:
> What about the performance penalty that you're warned about with
> locales (in the admin guide)?

You pay it if you don't select C locale at initdb time, true.

> Does multibyte support entail the same penalty?

AFAIR, MULTIBYTE doesn't kill LIKE optimization, but it does incur
a generalized performance penalty on all string-mashing operators.
Never tried to measure the size of the penalty; perhaps Tatsuo or
Hiroshi would know.

> If not, then multibyte encoding, providing a superset of the
> locale functionality (correct?), would be better than locales, right?

MULTIBYTE is *not* a superset of LOCALE; they are independently
enablable features. Offhand I don't think they are both interesting
for the same character sets.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-01-29 19:02:34 Re: Upgrade 7.0.3 -> 7.1.3 problems!
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-01-29 18:33:00 Re: 7.2 RPMs (Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v7.2rc2 Released)