Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend
Date: 2021-06-03 17:37:26
Message-ID: 1538bd8894fc723d97d5c41b9d4bb8feb9db0d43.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2020-10-27 at 23:39 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> Maybe we should just have --with-ssl={openssl,nss}? That'd avoid
> needing
> to check for errors.

[ apologies for the late reply ]

Would it be more proper to call it --with-tls={openssl,nss} ?

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-06-03 17:41:48 Re: SSL SNI
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2021-06-03 17:25:24 Re: SSL SNI