| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Streaming replication document improvements |
| Date: | 2010-04-01 14:08:49 |
| Message-ID: | 15381.1270130929@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Fujii Masao wrote:
>> Preventing superuser connections from consuming superuser_reserved_connections
>> slots seems strange for me. So I'm leaning toward just removing superuser
>> privilege from replication connection again. Thought?
> That would be good, but I fear it's a bigger change than we should be
> doing at this point.
Exactly. Despite Robert's unhappiness, NONE of this should get changed
right now. When and if we create a separate replication privilege,
it'll be time enough to revisit the connection limit arithmetic.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-04-01 17:18:45 | Re: [DOCS] Streaming replication document improvements |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-04-01 13:52:57 | Re: confusing archive_command example |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-04-01 14:09:56 | Re: Feature request - function-based deferrable uniques. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-04-01 14:04:47 | Re: [SPAM]Re: Questions about 9.0 release note |