From: | padusuma <venkata(dot)adusumalli(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Performance of INSERT into temporary tables using psqlODBC driver |
Date: | 2018-09-16 05:29:24 |
Message-ID: | 1537075764890-0.post@n3.nabble.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hello Tim,
>Re-implementation of a solution is often a hard case to sell, but it
>might be the only way to get the performance you want. The big positive
>to a re-implementation is that you usually get a better solution because
>you are implementing with more knowledge and experience about the
>problem domain. Design is often cleaner and as a result, easier to
>maintain. It usually takes a lot less time than the original
>implementation as well and can be the more economical solution compared
>to fighting a system which has fundamental design limitations that
>restrict performance.
Thank you for the suggestions and advice. I will definitely look into
re-implementation of certain parts of our solution as an option to improve
performance.
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-performance-f2050081.html
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rory Campbell-Lange | 2018-09-16 12:23:36 | Advice on machine specs for growth |
Previous Message | Tim Cross | 2018-09-16 02:19:31 | Re: Performance of INSERT into temporary tables using psqlODBC driver |