| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tim Keitt" <tkeitt(at)keittlab(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pointer scope and memory contexts |
| Date: | 2008-11-06 13:28:08 |
| Message-ID: | 15359.1225978088@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Tim Keitt" <tkeitt(at)keittlab(dot)org> writes:
> [questions]
Switching memory contexts, in itself, only switches which context a bare
palloc() will allocate from (as opposed to MemoryContextAlloc). It
cannot have some magic impact on the validity of existing pointers.
> One last question: if I call SPI_finish, on the first call, do I need
> to switch contexts in the per-call section? (I saw some example code
> that suggested one needs to switch contexts back to
> multi_call_memory_ctx after SPI_finish.)
I believe SPI_finish will switch back to the context that was current
when SPI_connect was called.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-11-06 13:37:47 | Re: plperl needs upgrade for Fedora 10 |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2008-11-06 13:16:12 | Re: regression in analyze |