Re: pg_dump versus hash partitioning

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew <pgsqlhackers(at)andrewrepp(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pg_dump versus hash partitioning
Date: 2023-02-02 15:04:10
Message-ID: 1534640.1675350250@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> ... so for --load-via-partition-root=auto (or
> whatever), we need to ensure that we detect hash partitioning all the
> way down from the topmost to the leaves.

Yeah, that had already occurred to me, which is why I was not feeling
confident about it being an easy hack in pg_dump.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dmitry Dolgov 2023-02-02 15:05:54 Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-02-02 15:00:58 Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner