From: | legrand legrand <legrand_legrand(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 11 global index |
Date: | 2018-08-13 22:39:44 |
Message-ID: | 1534199984998-0.post@n3.nabble.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Hello,
I was wondering if a simple trigger inserting ID values in a dedicated table
with an UNIQUE key
would have a chance to give similar performances than you trigger checking
ID with
SELECT count(1) > 1 FROM tabpart WHERE id = NEW.id
knowing that both triggers gives the same concurrency benefits ...
Find attached a little test case on my
PostgreSQL 11beta2 on x86_64-w64-mingw32, compiled by gcc.exe
(x86_64-win32-seh-rev1, Built by MinGW-W64 project) 7.2.0, 64-bit
inserting 100.000 lignes in a non partitionned table with a unique KEY takes
627 ms
inserting 100.000 lignes in a partitionned table (10 part) with "SELECT
COUNT" trigger takes 6696 ms
inserting 100.000 lignes in a partitionned table (10 part) with "INSERT ID
values" trigger takes 1634 ms
Is that ratio the same on a Linux box ?
I'm suspecting parsing time for "SELECT count(1) > 1 FROM tabpart WHERE id =
NEW.id",
is that possible ?
test_gbl_index.sql
<http://www.postgresql-archive.org/file/t348768/test_gbl_index.sql>
Regards
PAscal
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-admin-f2076596.html
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Ribe | 2018-08-13 22:44:49 | Re: PostgreSQL 11 global index |
Previous Message | Ilyass Kaouam | 2018-08-13 21:10:03 | Re: Secure dump file |