Re: pl/pgsql enabled by default

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pl/pgsql enabled by default
Date: 2005-05-06 16:16:20
Message-ID: 15341.1115396180@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Another problem with this proposal is that installations without
>> shared-library support will stop working entirely.

> How do we manage to run regression tests for such installations?

We don't. However, degraded functionality is better than none at all.
I don't want to create a scenario where initdb dies if plpgsql isn't
available.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2005-05-06 16:19:12 Re: pl/pgsql enabled by default
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-05-06 16:13:41 Re: pl/pgsql enabled by default