Re: UPDATE operation terminates logical replication receiver process due to an assertion

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: v(dot)davydov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: UPDATE operation terminates logical replication receiver process due to an assertion
Date: 2023-01-15 18:48:07
Message-ID: 1533143.1673808487@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 01:25:11PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> v15? That assert is from 8bf6ec3ba, which wasn't back-patched.

> The assert isn't from 8bf6 (Improve handling of inherited GENERATED
> expressions.), but rather:

> commit 3f7836ff651ad710fef52fa87b248ecdfc6468dc

Ah. I jumped to the wrong conclusion after failing to reproduce
on v15, but I must've fat-fingered the test case somehow.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2023-01-15 19:11:51 Re: [PATCH] Add <<none>> support to sepgsql_restorecon
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2023-01-15 18:35:28 Re: UPDATE operation terminates logical replication receiver process due to an assertion