| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "PostgreSQL Patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Win32 signals & sockets |
| Date: | 2004-11-16 19:42:16 |
| Message-ID: | 1533.1100634136@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
> This patch *replaces* the previous one. Contains the exact same changes,
> except it *also* contains the move of the backend parameter file to
> shared memory on win32.
I think it's way too late in the beta cycle for significant changes in
the fork mechanism ... especially if the gain is only 10% on something
that isn't a performance issue for properly written applications anyway.
Can I safely ignore this patch and use the prior one, or are there
additional bug fixes in this?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-11-16 19:52:55 | Re: [PORTS] Windows XP could not get token information: 122 |
| Previous Message | Guillaume LELARGE | 2004-11-16 10:02:44 | Updated french translations for 8.0 |