Re: ecpg - GRANT bug

All in all it doesn't really matter... Michael's already applied a
better fix! For some reason Tom's email has been lost in the system
for weeks!

Lee.

Bruce Momjian writes:
> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 12:44:09PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > I saw that change from 8 to 7. I think in the ecpg code that the first
> > > parameter to cat_str is the number of arguments _after_ the first
> > > parameter.
> >
> > It is indeed.
> >
> > > so I think the change from 8 -> 7 is correct.
> >
> > Not exactly. Yes, the cat_str has 7 arguments besides the number, but the
> > rule suggests it should have 8.
>
> Sorry, I am lost. The rule above says to count the number of params
> after the first one. Doesn't that make it 7?
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html