Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Mario Weilguni" <mario(dot)weilguni(at)icomedias(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Inefficient handling of LO-restore + Patch
Date: 2002-04-11 15:44:41
Message-ID: 1532.1018539881@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Mario Weilguni" <mario(dot)weilguni(at)icomedias(dot)com> writes:
> And I did not find out how I can detect the large object
> chunksize, either from getting it from the headers (include
> "storage/large_object.h" did not work)

Why not?

Still, it might make sense to move the LOBLKSIZE definition into
pg_config.h, since as you say it's of some interest to clients like
pg_dump.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-04-11 15:46:03 Re: help with bison
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-04-11 15:41:08 Re: Make text output more generic