Re: FK v.s unique indexes

From: pinker <pinker(at)onet(dot)eu>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FK v.s unique indexes
Date: 2018-07-05 08:54:33
Message-ID: 1530780873796-0.post@n3.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

David Rowley-3 wrote
> I don't think there were any actual roadblocks, it was more of just
> not enough time in the cycle to make it work due to a few technical
> details that required extra effort to make work.
>
> Alvaro managed to simplify the problem and allow foreign keys to be
> defined on partitioned tables and get that into PG11.
>
> So it was a case of 50% is better than 0%, which I very agree with.

That's a really great news. I was waiting for this feature for many years.
Finally! Thank you guys!

--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-general-f1843780.html

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rafia Sabih 2018-07-05 11:16:09 Re: Parallel Aware
Previous Message Rob Sargent 2018-07-05 08:11:51 Re: FK v.s unique indexes