From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | List pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WIP Join Removal |
Date: | 2008-09-02 16:35:21 |
Message-ID: | 15301.1220373321@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> + if (removable &&
> + joinrel->cheapest_total_path < keeprel->cheapest_total_path)
> + {
> + elog(LOG, "join removed");
> + joinrel->pathlist = keeprel->pathlist;
> + joinrel->joininfo = keeprel->baserestrictinfo;
> + }
> + }
On third thought: if you think that the join paths could possibly win,
then the correct coding here is something like
foreach(path, keeprel->pathlist)
add_path(joinrel, ...)
The reason is that it's not an all-or-nothing choice: some of the paths
might offer cheaper startup cost, or present a useful sort order.
So just present them as available alternatives and let add_path sort it
out.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-09-02 17:13:40 | Re: WIP Join Removal |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-09-02 16:28:10 | Re: WIP Join Removal |