Re: release process

From: Steven Schlansker <stevenschlansker(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: release process
Date: 2015-02-18 16:59:47
Message-ID: 152AB8E4-F2C6-4998-9F47-264E2656B27D@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

+1 to both. You can always make a branch later from the tag if you need to release a patch version.

> On Feb 18, 2015, at 8:57 AM, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> The current release / branching seems onerous. I'm wondering if it wouldn't be easier to just have a master branch going forward and just tag releases ?
>
> I'd also like to consider moving away from the numbering scheme paralleling the server numbering scheme
>
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> Dave Cramer

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Nelson 2015-02-18 22:27:10 Re: release process
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2015-02-18 16:57:00 release process