| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Gabriela Serventi <gabrielaserventi(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Compile 14.1 in EL5.8 |
| Date: | 2022-02-10 01:23:28 |
| Message-ID: | 1528559.1644456208@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> ... I wondered about also removing the leftover comment
> "We assume that any system that has Linux epoll() also has Linux
> signalfd()" which was my attempt to explain that there wasn't a
> separate configure check for signalfd.h, but I guess the sentence is
> still true in a more general sense, so we can just leave it there.
Oh, I didn't notice that comment, or I probably would have tweaked it.
Perhaps along the line of "there are too few systems that have epoll
and not signalfd to justify maintaining a separate code path"?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2022-02-10 01:25:53 | Re: Compile 14.1 in EL5.8 |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2022-02-10 01:18:53 | Re: Compile 14.1 in EL5.8 |