From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Adrian Maier <adrian(dot)maier(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: float8 regression failure (HEAD, cygwin) |
Date: | 2006-08-01 13:17:18 |
Message-ID: | 1527.1154438238@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I thought about that too but it seems a very bad idea. small-is-zero is
>> distinctly "less correct" than the regular output, and I don't think we
>> want pg_regress to be blindly accepting it as OK on any platform.
> Yes, good points. One other thought I had was that we could have
> pg_regress always allow a fallback to the canonical result file.
Hm, that's a good thought. Want to see how painful it is to code?
One thing I realized while looking at resultmap just now is that the
handmade regex matcher code I wrote for pg_regress.c (lifted from the
backend's LIKE algorithm) doesn't handle bracketed character classes,
but we've got one of those in resultmap:
float8/i.86-.*-freebsd[234]=float8-small-is-zero
Dunno how I missed that :-(. So presumably HEAD would be failing right
now on freebsd-before-5.0, if we had any of 'em in the buildfarm.
Adding char-class code to the matcher wouldn't be too hard, but it
probably wouldn't solve the cygwin problem, and as I mentioned I feel
zero allegiance to the historical format of resultmap anyway --- it
was designed the way it is purely because it was fairly easy to handle
in a few lines of shell script.
If we used your idea of always allowing a fallback to the canonical
file, then we could just make the freebsd line
float8/i.86-.*-freebsd=float8-small-is-zero
and it would do the right thing. Alternatively we could do something
more adventurous with matching to OS versions --- I'm envisioning
something roughly like
float8/i.86-.*-freebsd<5=float8-small-is-zero
float8/i.86-pc-cygwin<5.0.21=float8-small-is-zero
This would be more flexible in the long run, but might be overkill.
The fallback idea sounds like a reasonable compromise ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-08-01 13:17:23 | Re: Online index builds |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-01 13:01:53 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-08-01 14:12:01 | Re: [HACKERS] float8 regression failure (HEAD, cygwin) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-01 13:01:53 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |