Re: autovacuum vs. createdb

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ben <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: autovacuum vs. createdb
Date: 2008-01-16 00:01:56
Message-ID: 15252.1200441716@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Ben <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com> writes:
> I'm noticing a problem where autovacuum touching template1 when createdb
> is run is making createdb fail. That's easy to work around when doing
> things by hand (just run it again), but when running createdb with a
> script, it's not so clear to me how to keep things working all the time.

There's a fix for this in 8.3, but in existing releases about all you
can do is make your script wait a few seconds and retry.

> One thought I had was having my script insert rows into pg_autovacuum
> temporarily (I assume in template1) but I'm not sure what tables I need to
> tell the autovacuum daemon to keep away from.

That seems counterproductive: any churn you make in template1 will mean
that autovacuum actually has something to do there, which you don't
want.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message T.J. Adami 2008-01-16 00:07:21 Re: COUNT() with ORDER BY
Previous Message Clodoaldo 2008-01-15 23:56:21 Re: ATTN: Clodaldo was Performance problem. Could it be related to 8.3-beta4?