Re: New alpha spinlock code passes regression test

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Arrigo Triulzi <arrigo(at)albourne(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development Mailing list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New alpha spinlock code passes regression test
Date: 2000-06-14 17:03:13
Message-ID: 15248.961002193@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Cool --- did you try the parallel regress tests, or just sequential?

My experience is that it takes quite a few iterations of the parallel
tests before you should have much confidence that there aren't locking
bugs lurking. But if it comes through that, send in the patch and
we'll gratefully accept it!

regards, tom lane

PS: also please note my just-posted call for testers of the fmgr
changes...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew N. Dodd 2000-06-14 17:18:41 Re: Back online
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-06-14 17:01:26 Re: [HACKERS] Call for port testing on fmgr changes