Re: unreliable behaviour of track_functions

From: pinker <pinker(at)onet(dot)eu>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: unreliable behaviour of track_functions
Date: 2018-04-01 13:10:57
Message-ID: 1522588257730-0.post@n3.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

and to be clear I was experimenting with pg_stat_clear_snapshot() after your
answer, but it doesn't change behaviour of track_functions.

--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-general-f1843780.html

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2018-04-01 14:57:02 Re: Please suggest the best suited unit test frame work for postgresql database.
Previous Message pinker 2018-04-01 13:02:15 Re: unreliable behaviour of track_functions