From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? |
Date: | 2015-07-03 20:05:17 |
Message-ID: | 15205.1435953917@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> With inserts the WAL records look as follows (relfilenodes changed):
> ...
> And amazingly, the database cluster successfuly recovers and there's no
> error now. So the problem is *only* because there is no data in the
> table at commit time. Which indicates that it's the 'newroot" record
> that saves the day normally. And it's apparently generated by the
> first insert.
Yeah, because the correct "empty" state of a btree index is to have a
metapage but no root page, so the first insert forces creation of a root
page. And, by chance, btree_xlog_newroot restores the metapage from
scratch, so this works even if the metapage had been missing or corrupt.
However, things would still break if the first access to the index was
a read attempt rather than an insert.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2015-07-03 20:41:48 | Re: Asynchronous execution on FDW |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2015-07-03 19:57:36 | Re: WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? |