Re: pgAgent: C++ Port - Patch Review

From: Linreg <linreg(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgAgent: C++ Port - Patch Review
Date: 2013-09-17 13:59:04
Message-ID: 1519217.uT2J7kfdsd@wolfclan.ang.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Hi Dave,

Connection Pooling:
okay. I will reimplementing the connection pool.

Am Sonntag, 15. September 2013, 15:02:03 schrieb Dave Page:
> > > Another problem that I've noticed is that you've unconditionally
> > >
> > > changed the logging format to be pipe delimited. This is also not
> > >
> > > acceptable as part of this patch, and should be discussed and
> > >
> > > implemented separately. At minimum, this would need to be a
> > >
> > > configurable behaviour change, and by default, I would want it to
> > >
> > > implement standard (comma delimited) CSV, not a pipe delimited
> > >
> > > version.
> >
> > okay. i change this feature to configurable behaviour.
> >
> > By default logging will be as before.
> >
> > can i add an commandline parameter for this?
> >
> > is it than acceptable?
>
> I think so - but please do that as a separate patch. We don't like to mixup
> multiple changes in the same patch/commit as it's harder to find issues or
> review the history in the future.

okay. I will make it so.

> > Okay, thats a problem.
> >
> > I use features from c++11 standard like "atomic" and "thread"
> >
> > My suggestion:
> >
> > the Pure-C++-Version is is for newer OS / Compiler suits and not backward
> > compatible (relating compiler / c++ version)
> >
> > Is the way a possible?
>
> Not really, as it requires maintenance of 2 code branches until we can
> completely deprecate the old wxWidgets code. That's why PostgreSQL itself
> is extremely conservative about what they'll support. We're not nearly as
> bad as that, but we do need to carry on supporting RHEL 5 and similarly
> aged OSs for a while.

I examine whether the use of the boost lib is possible. it should.
I think they has a better backward compatibility.
Please can you review this for me by
http://www.boost.org/development/tests/release/developer/statechart.html
you know better than i the version of supported compiler / plattforms.

Thomas Steffen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Lelarge 2013-09-17 17:44:27 pgAdmin website commit: Fix the release date
Previous Message Neel Patel 2013-09-17 12:38:25 Fix for Slony replication issue in pgAdmin