| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |
| Date: | 2015-08-19 18:11:31 |
| Message-ID: | 15172.1440007891@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru> writes:
> On 2015.08.20 at 00:17:35 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>> One downside of this is, if one of the standby servers is not
>> responding, every time clients will be blocked by the server before
>> giving up the connection trial. This could last for hours (for
> This shouldn't happen. My proposal was to connect all servers
> simultaneously, and then use that connection which would be established
> first closing other ones
That seems like seriously unfriendly behavior. It will trigger dropped
connection bleats in the server logs, not to mentioned wasted process
forks.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-08-19 19:33:23 | Re: proposal: function parse_ident |
| Previous Message | jacques klein | 2015-08-19 17:45:47 | Re: how to write/setup a C trigger function in a background worker |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | rcohen | 2015-08-19 18:16:39 | Re: sql type reported for enum |
| Previous Message | Victor Wagner | 2015-08-19 17:34:48 | Re: Proposal: Implement failover on libpq connect level. |