From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | DT <kurt023(at)hotmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: What are ExecSeqMarkPos and ExecSeqRestrPos used for |
Date: | 2013-06-01 04:47:51 |
Message-ID: | 15157.1370062071@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * DT (kurt023(at)hotmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> I'm reading code of nodeSeqscan, and was confused with ExecSeqMarkPos and
>> ExecSeqRestrPos. They are only called by ExecMergeJoin. Could merge join use
>> a plain seqscan as outer/inner plan? If not, what are they used for?
> ExecSeqMarkPos and ExecSeqRestPos are called through execAmi.c's
> generalized ExecMarkPos and ExecRestrPos, which are then used by both
> nodeMergejoin.c and nodeResult.c. Offhand, it seems unlikely that there
> would ever be a path from MergeJoin down to ExecSeqMarkPos as MergeJoin
> requires sorted inputs. Perhaps it could happen with a full cartesian
> product but I don't know that we'd ever use a MergeJoin to implement
> that or that we have such an optimization today.
I'm pretty sure those are dead code. See the comment for
ExecSupportsMarkRestore.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-06-01 05:18:57 | Re: Strange behavior of "=" as assignment operator |
Previous Message | Bosco Rama | 2013-06-01 04:14:52 | Re: Using a CTE for an update |