| From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-core <pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode |
| Date: | 2015-06-06 16:33:23 |
| Message-ID: | 1514721236.6292951.1433608403856.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Tom, for example, has previously not wanted to even bump
> catversion after beta1, which rules out a huge variety of
> possible fixes and interface changes. If we want to make a
> policy decision to change our approach, we should be up-front
> about that.
What?!? There have been catversion bumps between the REL?_?_BETA1
tag and the REL?_?_0 tag for 8.2, 8.3, 9.0, 9.1, 9.3, and 9.4.
(That is, it has happend on 6 of the last 8 releases.) I don't
think we're talking about any policy change here. We try to avoid
a catversion bump after beta if we can; we're not that reluctant to
do so if needed.
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2015-06-06 16:55:58 | Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode |
| Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2015-06-06 16:11:36 | pg_stat_archiver issue with aborted archiver |