Re: Removing INNER JOINs

From: Jim Finnerty <jfinnert(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Removing INNER JOINs
Date: 2017-12-11 04:33:21
Message-ID: 1512966801439-0.post@n3.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

FK constraint enforcement may be deferred, but only to the end of the DML
transaction. Can someone provide an example where a SELECT statement that
is not in that DML transaction and that can view only committed data can see
a FK-side row that doesn't join with any PK-side row?

I don't think I understand why the volatile function scenario. Can a
volatile function somehow circumvent FK enforcement? If not, then why is
the volatile function scenario different than any other DML with respect to
the enforcement of FK constraints?

thank you,

/Jim F

--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-general-f1843780.html

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tsunakawa, Takayuki 2017-12-11 07:09:41 Is it possible to sort strings in EBCDIC order in PostgreSQL server?
Previous Message Gmail 2017-12-10 23:39:59 Re: Display table entries using partial column entry