From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, btober(at)seaworthysys(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Temporary tables and miscellaneous schemas |
Date: | 2003-10-27 22:34:54 |
Message-ID: | 15124.1067294094@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org> writes:
>> To take just one problem, the newbies who could use the "friendly
>> user" mode are very likely the same ones who do all their work as
>> postgres, because it hasn't occurred to them to create any
>> unprivileged users. They won't get the benefit of it if we make it
>> act as you suggest.
> Hrm, well, two flaws with that argument being:
> 1) Users who (ab)use DBA accounts aren't likely the ones with
> gazillions of pg_temp_* tables and probably don't even make use of
> temp tables or care about pg_toast. No harm, no foul, as the
> feature isn't likely used.
Perhaps, but you were arguing (I thought) for instituting a bunch of
differences in behavior between user and DBA modes, not only this one.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rada Chirkova | 2003-10-27 22:37:22 | What is an RT index? |
Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2003-10-27 22:19:56 | grant all to database inheritence |