Re: Plan for update ... where a is not distinct from b

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: "Peter J(dot) Holzer" <hjp-pgsql(at)hjp(dot)at>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Plan for update ... where a is not distinct from b
Date: 2017-11-28 19:48:24
Message-ID: 1511898504.2375.6.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> I noticed that an update was taking a long time and found this:
>
> UPDATE public.facttable_imf_ifs p
> SET [...lots of columns...]
> FROM cleansing.cls_imf_ifs_facttable_imf_ifs c, cleansing.cleansing_change_type ct
> WHERE
> (p.macrobondtimeseries is not distinct from c.macrobondtimeseries) AND (p.date is not distinct from c.date)
> AND c.cleansing_change_type_id = ct.cleansing_change_type_id
> AND ct.cleansing_change_type_desc_short IN ('UPDATED_NEW')

It is kind of ugly, and I didn't test it, but here is an idea:

Suppose we know a value that cannot occur in both p.date and c.date.

Then you could write

WHERE coalesce(p.date, '0044-03-15 BC') = coalesce(c.date, '0044-03-15 BC')

and create an index on the coalesce expressions to facilitate
a merge join.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Gordon 2017-11-28 20:06:22 Where to troubleshoot phpPgAdmin login issues?
Previous Message Rakesh Kumar 2017-11-28 18:58:23 Re: [GENERAL] - Regarding Schema ROLLBACK