Re: AW: OID wraparound: summary and proposal

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: AW: OID wraparound: summary and proposal
Date: 2001-08-03 01:09:25
Message-ID: 15118.996800965@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> Hmm there seems to be an assumption that people could
> know whether they need OID or not for each table.

A good point, and one reason not to make no-OIDs the default. I'm
envisioning that people will turn off OIDs only for tables that they
know will be very large and that they know they don't need OIDs for.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2001-08-03 01:26:13 RE: FUNCTION Question...
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2001-08-03 01:07:40 Re: AW: OID wraparound: summary and proposal