From: | Daniel Silva <daniel(dot)silva(at)ipm(dot)com(dot)br> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #14062: pg_dump dies after dumping first 60 gigabytes of text for large table |
Date: | 2017-11-22 11:59:26 |
Message-ID: | 1511351966769-0.post@n3.nabble.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
dll wrote
> Amazon RDS instance has a default value of 0 for ssl_renegotiation_limit
> for
> the postgres 9.4 default parameters, according to the RDS Dashboard.
>
> However, when we disable SSL connections the problem evaporates. Good
> enough
> for me.
>
> Thanks, Tom!
>
> On 4/4/2016 12:56 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
> dll@
> writes:
>>> For an approximately 500 gigabyte database, pg_dump dies after
>>> approximately
>>> 60 gb of text output, with an error:
>>
>>> pg_dump: Dumping the contents of table "datum" failed: PQgetCopyData()
>>> failed.
>>> pg_dump: Error message from server: SSL SYSCALL error: EOF detected
>>
>> Sounds like an SSL renegotiation bug. We gave up on that mess and
>> disabled renegotiation by default as of 9.4.5 or so, but maybe you have
>> an explicit nonzero setting for ssl_renegotiation_limit?
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> In my case, ssl disable.
>
> it's table "tbwww", size around 70GB. My config server it's similar Redhat
> 7.2 and Postgres 9.5.3
>
> For erro:
> Line 21172: pg_dump: Dumping the contents of table "tbwww" failed:
> PQgetCopyData() failed.
> Line 21173: pg_dump: Error message from server: server closed the
> connection unexpectedly
> Line 21176: pg_dump: The command was: COPY file.tbwww (fileid, filename,
> filenamedownload, file, filedate, coduser) TO stdout;
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (
> pgsql-bugs@
> )
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-bugs-f2117394.html
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | AP | 2017-11-23 05:31:36 | Re: 10.1: hash index size exploding on vacuum full analyze |
Previous Message | Raju.external3 | 2017-11-22 10:41:43 | Windows 10 Support Version |