From: | Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [Patch] PDF builds on Red Hat for <= 9.6 |
Date: | 2017-11-08 17:07:11 |
Message-ID: | 1510160831.30514.19.camel@gunduz.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Hi Tom,
On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 11:54 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hm ... my RHEL6 machine, which certainly can build the documentation,
> hasn't got either of those:
<snip>
> So evidently Red Hat has refactored their TeX RPMs since then.
> I don't doubt Devrim's conclusions are good for recent Red Hat
> releases,
Right, I tested on Fedora 26, and then on RHEL 7. Sorry.
> but we might want to add some weasel wording saying
> that the required package set has moved around.
>
> Personally, my longstanding habit has been to select the
> "Authoring & Publishing" package set when installing any new
> RHEL or Fedora box, and as far as I can recall, that's always
> Just Worked for building PG docs. Maybe we should mention
> that strategy as a preferable one.
This will install extra packages, which are not needed, but given that very few
people will install this set, I am fine with this solution.
Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | bnachtrieb | 2017-11-08 18:59:20 | link broken |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-11-08 16:54:37 | Re: [Patch] PDF builds on Red Hat for <= 9.6 |